Conciliation Talks End Between Dalhousie Faculty Association and Board of Governors

CTV coverage  - Nova Scotia Advocate coverageDalhousie Gazette coverage - Watch Magazine coverage  

October 19, 2020: Conciliation between the Dalhousie Faculty Association and the Board of Governors has failed. “While today was the first of two days scheduled for conciliation, we reached an impasse this morning,” says DFA President David Westwood. “The Board presented their best offer, and they have not moved on a few critical issues related to our pension that are unacceptable to our members. At a time when the university needs everyone working together, the Board is choosing to push our members to the brink.”

“The Board rejected our initial approach, which was to delay bargaining for a year and allow time for some of the uncertainty related to COVID-19 to settle down,” notes Westwood. “Instead, they chose to push ahead and attack existing pension benefits of our members, demanding changes that will disadvantage both future and current retirees.”

The Board’s offer will be presented to the DFA membership later this week and they will be asked to vote on whether or not to accept the offer.   Earlier this month, the DFA membership delivered a strong strike mandate – almost 91% of the voting membership said “yes” to strike action in support of DFA’s position at the table. Nearly 87% of DFA members cast a vote.

“They know the results of our strike vote, so they understand that by demanding these changes they are triggering a labour disruption which will further increase the stress and pressure on students as they try to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic,” continues Westwood. “If the Board genuinely wants stability, as they claim in their messaging, the easiest way is to back off their demands for unnecessary and unacceptable reductions to existing pension benefits.”

The current collective agreement expired June 30, 2020.  Since mid-July, the two sides met seven times and were unable to reach an agreement.  The DFA filed for conciliation on September 22.   Now that conciliation has failed, Peter Lloyd, conciliation officer, will file his report with the Minister of Labour and Advanced Education.  Once that report has been filed, there is a 14-day waiting period before either side can engage in legal job action.

CAUT October 2020 Bulletin

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Canadian Association of University Teachers’ monthly publication, the CAUT Bulletin, has moved to an online-only format for the time being. The complete CAUT Bulletin is available for download in a PDF version on the CAUT website here

DFA Members Deliver Strong Strike Mandate

More than 90% of the members who cast ballots in the recent DFA strike vote said “yes” to strike action in support of the bargaining team's position in collective bargaining. A total of 86.7% of the DFA Membership participated in the vote that closed midnight on Monday, October 5, 2020.  Of those who voted, 90.6% voted in favour of strike action.“This gives our bargaining team a powerful strike mandate as we head into conciliation later this month,” says DFA President David Westwood. “Our members have given the Board of Governors a clear and unambiguous message: we will not accept their demands for unreasonable economic concessions on pensions and wages.” The Board tabled their most recent offer on September 18. It included reductions in pension benefits and three years without salary adjustments to reflect cost of living increases. The DFA filed for conciliation on September 22.  Conciliation officer Peter Lloyd has been appointed. Conciliation will take place October 19 and 22. (This was covered in the Chronicle Herald, NS Advocate, Halifax Today and

DFA Workload Survey Results Reveal Stress, Anxiety and a Feeling of Disrespect

In mid-September, the DFA conducted a workload survey.  Over 71% of our Membership (630 of 967) responded to the survey, a response rate which demonstrates the importance of workload issues to DFA Members.  More than 85% of respondents reported higher/substantially higher levels of stress when compared to last year.  They also reported feeling overworked and anxious.  In addition to quantitative results, the comments strongly reflect a common theme among our Members - feeling disrespected by the Board’s demands for serious economic concessions at a time when they are working harder than ever to deliver the academic mission of the institution.  On Tuesday, September 22, DFA President Dave Westwood sent the results to Dalhousie President Deep Saini and copied all Deans, expressing DFA's concerns about the health and well-being of our Members.  You can see the full quantitative results and brief summary of the comments here.

Copyright & On-line Teaching

Dear Colleagues,

The DFA office has received many enquiries about issues related to copyright, particularly in the context of on-line teaching. I thought it would be helpful to summarize the key points, and recommendations, that arise from our Collective Agreement. For reference, Article 23 addresses issues related to Copyrights, Patents and Author's Rights.

  1. DFA Members own the copyright for teaching materials that they create, including lectures (Clauses 23.01, 23.02, 23.03 and 23.04) subject to some narrow limitations.
  2. As the author of your teaching materials, including lectures and on line presentations, you can authorize others to use your copyrighted materials without giving up your ownership rights. The DFA recommends that when sharing your copyrighted materials, you should specify the terms of use in writing. Materials shared with others should be marked as copyrighted where feasible. This can be of particular importance in co-taught courses.
  3. Members who prepare lectures, tests and exams and other materials which are communicated in digital form should put a notice on all such material to the following effect: This lecture and any other materials provided for this course are subject to the copyright of the course instructor and may not be reproduced or copied in whole or in part without the consent of the instructor. Students who are enrolled in the course who have received this lecture or any other material may reproduce it in order to view it at a more convenient time but must destroy the reproduction within 30 days of receiving the final course evaluation.
  4. Under clause 23.06(b) the Board has a time-limited right to use certain kinds of teaching materials developed by Members under specific circumstances. Such arrangements require written agreement of the Member, and the Member retains copyright ownership over the materials. Annual workload agreements which describe a Member’s teaching responsibilities do not transfer licencing rights to the Board. However, given the ease of copying digital materials prepared for teaching courses on-line you should make it clear that the materials you have authored cannot be used by others without your specific consent. We encourage Members to consult with the DFA office before signing a workload agreement that includes the development of teaching materials.
  5. Article 23.03 compels the Board to provide every reasonable assistance to Members to prevent publication, recording, or broadcasting of lectures not authorized by the Members concerned. The DFA encourages Members to bring such concerns to the attention of their Dean. Through the Association Board Committee, the Board has committed to enabling a "pop-up" message in Brightspace alerting students that teaching materials are copyrighted.

As always, please reach out to the DFA Office for support ( if you have concerns about your working conditions.


Dave Westwood, DFA President 2020-2021

Meet the DFA's Bargaining Team

Members of the 2020 DFA Bargaining Team have been working diligently on behalf of our Members since late 2019.  Please take a few moments to learn a little about the people representing you at the bargaining table